Case Studies
See the technology that has saved operators
an average of 20 - 24 hours of rig time on more than 3,000 wells to date.
Case #1
Well Info
◦ JOB DESIGN – 4.5-7”-9 5/8 WBCO
◦ Deviation – 30 ⁰ S SHAPE
◦ Well MD – 16,500’
◦ Drilling Fluid – 15.3 – PPG OIL BASE MUD
◦ Completion Fluid – 10.02 PPG CaCl2
Objective
Clean out cement polish 4.5 Liner positive & negative test casing pickling and
displace to completion fluid reducing cost by save 72 hours rig time save 3 Run combining bit with polish mill and mechanical wellbore clean.
Conventional Procedures (1- Run in with Bit clean out cement 2- Run with WBCO for negative
test and displacement – Run in with polish mill to polish 4.5 liner )
Case #2
Well Info
◦ JOB DESIGN – 7” Inflow Test
◦ Deviation – 70 ⁰
◦ Well MD – 15.900’
◦ Drilling Fluid – 16.04– PPG OIL BASE MUD
◦ Completion Fluid – 10.02 PPG CaCl2
Objective
Clean out cement & drill shoe track positive & Negative test displace to new mud
weight for new section
Conventional Procedures (1- Run in with Bit clean out cement and shoe track – Run in with liner top Testing tools for positive
negative test)
Unconventional Procedures (Combining 3
Run in one trip and well ready for completion)
Services Provided
◦ Mechanical Wellbore Cleanout Tools – Casing Scraper - Casing Brush - Junk Basket - Magnet with Liner Top Testing Tools
◦ Displacement Chemicals
◦ Technical Proposal
◦ Tool Placement Design
◦ Wellsite Engineering Supervision
Results
◦ Fluid Interface – 9 BBL
◦ Volumes Circulated To Desired Fluid Clarity ( 15 NTU – 0.04 TSS ) Hole
◦ Total Circulating Time – 16 hr. 22 min
◦ Diff. Pressure - 3000 psi
Unconventional Procedures (Combining 2 Run in one trip and well ready for drill
new section)
Services Provided
◦ Mechanical Wellbore Cleanout Tools – Casing Scraper- – Junk Basket – Magnet With Liner Top Testing Tools
◦ Technical Proposal
◦ Tool Placement Design
◦ Wellsite Engineering Supervision
Results
◦ Fluid Interface – 9 BBL
◦ Hole Volumes Circulated to desired fluid clarity ( 12 PPG )
◦ Total Circulating Time – 8 HR
◦ Diff. Pressure - 4200 psi
3,000 Wells Completed 45,528 Hours Saved
Case #3
Well Info
◦ JOB DESIGN – 4.5”-7” – 9 5/8 - WBCO
◦ Deviation – 90 ⁰
◦ Well MD – 18984 ’
◦ Drilling Fluid – 12.56– PPG OIL BASE MUD
◦ Completion Fluid – 10.02 PPG CaCl2
Objective
Conventional Procedures (1- Run in with Bit clean out cement 2- Run with WBCO for negative
test and displacement – Run in with polish mill to polish 4.5 liner)
Conventional Procedures (1- Run in with Bit clean out cement 2- Run with WBCO for negative test and displacement – Run in
with polish mill to polish 4.5 liner )
Case #4
Well Info
◦ JOB DESIGN – 4.5”-7” – 9 5/8 - WBCO
◦ Deviation – 40 ⁰
◦ Well MD – 14987 ’
◦ Drilling Fluid – 16 – PPG OIL BASE MUD
◦ Completion Fluid – 10.02 PPG CaCl2
Objective
Clean out cement positive negative Test – casing pickling and displace to
completion fluid to save 36 hours from rig time combining Liner Top Testing Tools)
Conventional Procedures (1- Run retrivematic Packer for Negative Test 2- Run with WBCO for Casing Pickling and displacement)
Unconventional Procedures (Combining 3 Run in one trip and well ready for completion)
Services Provided
◦ Mechanical Wellbore Cleanout Tools – Scraper – Brush – Magnet - Junk Basket with Liner Top Testing Tools
◦ Technical Proposal
◦ displacement Chemicals
◦ Tool Placement Design
◦ Wellsite Engineering Supervision
Results
◦ Fluid Interface – 9 BBL
◦ Volumes Circulated to desired fluid clarity
(15 NTU – 0.04 TSS) Hole
◦ Total Circulating Time – 18 HR
◦ Diff. Pressure - 4600 psi
Unconventional Procedures (Combining 2 Run in one trip and well ready for completion)
Services Provided
◦ Mechanical Wellbore Cleanout Tools – Scraper – Brush – Magnet - Junk Basket with Liner Top Testing Tools
◦ Technical Proposal
◦ displacement Chemicals
◦ Tool Placement Design
◦ Wellsite Engineering Supervision
Results
◦ Fluid Interface – 9 BBL
◦ Volumes Circulated to desired fluid clarity
(15 NTU – 0.04 TSS) Hole
◦ Total Circulating Time – 18 HR
◦ Diff. Pressure - 3800 psi
